Yesterday in class, Erin and Jason presented on the
topic of Holacracy. This was something that I had never heard of before this
class, so I was definitely interested to hear what they had to say about the
topic. I found out that Holacracy is basically a new and revolutionary way of
running an organization. Holacracy gets rid of the management hierarchy that most
organizations run on in today’s society. A definition that I found from the
Holacracy website says, “Holacracy is a complete, packaged system for
self-management in organizations. Holacracy replaces the traditional management
hierarchy with a new peer-to-peer “operating system” that increases
transparency, accountability, and organizational agility” (http://www.holacracy.org/how-it-works/).
Basically it is a system to run an organization in which there are no managers
and every employee is seen as equal to one another. Once I learned what it
actually was I was definitely interested by also very surprised by the idea. I was
wondering how an organization could stay organized and successful without a management
system.
In the presentation, they talked a lot about the
company Zappos which has implemented the Holacracy management scheme and got
rid of the traditional way of management. One of the things we discussed in
class was how do problems get resolved if there is no upper management involved
to facilitate problem solving. I found an article in Forbes that talks about Zappos
and how their transition to Holacracy has gone so far. In the article they talk
about how to resolve problems in the workplace. The article said, “If employees
have a problem with what is going on, they can flag a “Tension.” The procedure
for doing so was clarified as recently as April 10, 2015.” It also went on to
describe the procedure used to solve the “tension”.
Taken directly from the Forbes article – (https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2015/05/23/is-holacracy-succeeding-at-zappos/#514c914156dc)
How To Use My Tensions Outside Of A
Governance Meeting
- When
you have a tension for governance, add it to your My Tensions list
(found in the blue navigation bar next to My Projects). Type
as little or as much as you need for each tension. Save the tension.
- There
is also an option as a tactical output called Tension to capture
governance tensions.
- Here
you can also add an agenda item, the tension, circle, and a proposal if
you want.
- Edit
the proposal later to be prepared before the meeting. The benefit of this
is that you have a way of both tracking tensions and starting proposals
outside of meetings.
- Create
draft proposals with multiple parts, just like Secretary does during the
Governance meeting. Your proposal will be available to select for the next
Governance agenda, but you don’t have to add it to the list if you aren’t
ready.
- Capture
a tension even if you don’t know a starting proposal yet
During The Governance Meeting
- When
there is a Governance meeting open, click Join Governance meeting
to be able to add your tensions to the agenda. Then click the ‘choose
from tensions' link right below where you enter agenda items to add
your tension to the list. You get a pop up of agenda items / tensions, and
you click to add it to the agenda.
- When
Secretary selects your agenda item, those watching via ‘Join Governance’
link will see the proposal, just like when it is entered by Secretary.
- When
you click on the agenda item that was added from someone’s My
Tensions list pre-populated proposals automatically load in
GlassFrog. Edits to any parts of the proposal made before clicking Accept
Proposal are saved (so the originally pre-populated proposal is
changed if you change or remove anything.
- Once
Secretary clicks accept proposal then the agenda item can be 'checked
off'.”
I believe that this is a pretty long process and could
ultimately take away from the productivity of the organization as a whole. I think
they should schedule weekly meetings in which the employees can discuss their
problems and try to find solution as a group.
It's a really interesting process. It's very different from the management processes I was used to in a traditional hierarchical model. I'd love to see how this really works.
ReplyDeleteI think this is a very interesting way to run an organization. While it is different from traditional management, this could be useful in the way that every employee feels like an equal to their peers.
ReplyDelete